Unban request Juntu (Ban Reduced by Pipa)

[Pipa]

(2014-11-20 16:56)Juntu Wrote:  I believe you guys see from the chatlogs that i said "Take it to the forums" atleast a few times, along those lines atleast.

Once. And about 8 minutes after you "joined" their argument.

(2014-11-20 16:56)Juntu Wrote:  He said sorry, i believed he was at fault. Simple, isnt it? Not apparently.

They were trying to figure out which fault it was and Kookoo had a reasonable and mostly friendly attitude.

(2014-11-20 16:56)Juntu Wrote:  I meant not to "bully" anyone into "submission".

Thats nice to hear, but you were.

(2014-11-20 16:56)Juntu Wrote:  I did point out that he had a little bit of an attitude, he did. No way around that.

His attitude stemmed from the fact that psygo's reply was more than rude and he simple replied in a similar fashion. You simply pointed the finger at the wrong person.

(2014-11-20 16:56)Juntu Wrote:  And yes i propably shouldnt have called him what i did call him but i had no idea this would be taken that offensively, i have asked a few UK people if they think that is more offensive than, for example calling someone a penis and they said nope.

Irrelevant. Call your friends/mates a penis or pr.ick all day long as you please, but you don't call that other people on the server. Insults, no matter how minor they are, are against rule 1.1.

(2014-11-20 16:56)Juntu Wrote:  Again, responded a bit disrespectfully but totally called for how he was acting out. I just want to point out that im sorry, i didnt check the replay and it was Psygos fault. Didnt know that, i got a bit heated.

Not only was his attitude pretty reasonable, your attitude was way worse. It's a bit as if Piers Morgan was telling another person to be a less of a *Removed*.

Also considering your usual attitude on the sever, the metaphor really makes sense.

Quote:1.000 € fine for swearing - Text was: GTFO fu.ckface
1.000 € fine for swearing - Text was: Now what the fu.ck was that for

(2014-11-20 16:56)Juntu Wrote:  Pipa's words on the report implies that we are a "gang of bullying friends".. No. Its not like that at all, i didnt ask for Matt to join in, he was being Matt. Nor Orange, that was so uncalled for.

Never said you had this planned all along and started it intentionally. Good to know that you didn't want them to join in, but that doesn't change the outcome.

(2014-11-20 16:56)Juntu Wrote:  Truely sorry.

Thats nice to hear, but i am the wrong person to adress this to.

---

Fact of the matter is you four were bullying another player, who never made a mistake and only wanted to clear the incident up. He had a perfectly good reason to be upset, but remained mostly calm and professional. On the other side he had four people, 3 of which had not witnessed the accident nor did they try to figure it out, talking down to that player and even insulting him.

Not one of you had anything constructive to say and only joined the argument to pick on him.

We are a friendly community that welcomes new players and therefore we will not tolerate such behaviour. This is not my oppinion, but an unanimous oppinion that all TC members share.