2014-06-16, 14:24
Before I begin, I would like to say that I was not part of the incident(s) at hand. I merely saw it and thought it was an unfair treatment. I wasn't entirely sure whether I should bother you with this, but after speaking to a few people I decided it was the right thing to do.
● Your LFS Username: danlevy91
● Their LFS Usernames: Rumpel, Jason1984
● Their LFS GameNames: Rumpel, ÎßÀËGÅ™ [COP] (reads: ORANGE™ [COP])
● Replay Link: Here
● Replay Timestamps:
● Description of incident from June 15th 2014, ca. 9:45PM GMT
ORANGE™ [COP] was chasing a suspect, when Rumpel appeared and did not move for sirens twice in a short period of time, which is obviously against the rules. When ORANGE™ [COP] finished the chase, he initiated a pursuit on Rumpel for not moving for sirens. Rumpel failed to stop but eventually was forced to spectate for speeding in the pitlane. For this, he received an auto-fine by the InSim (as usual).
However, after Rumpel left the pits, ORANGE™ [COP] almost immediately initiated a chase again, Rumpel sped away and got auto-specced for the same reason as above.
When I saw this incident, I thought it was unfair that ORANGE™ [COP] chased him twice for the very same incident. Although I agree that not moving for sirens is a very serious offense which is bannable, I still think it isn't fair to chase a suspect for the same incident more than one time (if the suspect didn't repeat the offense that is!), but this is for you to decide.
Thank you for taking the time to read through this and decide on this matter.
Best Regards,
danlevy91 aka. KASOKUDO
● Postscript
For easy reference I have added an abridged chatlog for the argument starting at 14:17.00. This only contains relevant comments from people involved.
● Chatlog of incident from June 15th 2014, ca. 9:45PM GMT
---------------------------------------------
● Your LFS Username: danlevy91
● Their LFS Usernames: Rumpel, Jason1984
● Their LFS GameNames: Rumpel, ÎßÀËGÅ™ [COP] (reads: ORANGE™ [COP])
● Replay Link: Here
● Replay Timestamps:
- 09:58.00 - Rumpel does not move for sirens, first incident
- 10:54.00 - Rumpel does not move for sirens, second incident
- 11:48.00 - Chase finished, ORANGE™ [COP] chases Rumpel for failure to move for police
- 13:19.00 - Rumpel is specced for speeding in pits, receives auto-fine
- 13:42.00 - After leaving the pits, ORANGE™ [COP] initiates a chase for no apparent reason
- 13:51.00 - Rumpel is specced for speeding in pits, receives auto-fine again
- 14:17.00 onwards - I state that this is not legit, argument begins
● Description of incident from June 15th 2014, ca. 9:45PM GMT
ORANGE™ [COP] was chasing a suspect, when Rumpel appeared and did not move for sirens twice in a short period of time, which is obviously against the rules. When ORANGE™ [COP] finished the chase, he initiated a pursuit on Rumpel for not moving for sirens. Rumpel failed to stop but eventually was forced to spectate for speeding in the pitlane. For this, he received an auto-fine by the InSim (as usual).
However, after Rumpel left the pits, ORANGE™ [COP] almost immediately initiated a chase again, Rumpel sped away and got auto-specced for the same reason as above.
When I saw this incident, I thought it was unfair that ORANGE™ [COP] chased him twice for the very same incident. Although I agree that not moving for sirens is a very serious offense which is bannable, I still think it isn't fair to chase a suspect for the same incident more than one time (if the suspect didn't repeat the offense that is!), but this is for you to decide.
Thank you for taking the time to read through this and decide on this matter.
Best Regards,
danlevy91 aka. KASOKUDO
---------------------------------------------
● Postscript
For easy reference I have added an abridged chatlog for the argument starting at 14:17.00. This only contains relevant comments from people involved.
● Chatlog of incident from June 15th 2014, ca. 9:45PM GMT
Quote:KASOKUDO : that is not legit
KASOKUDO : i am sure it isn't
KASOKUDO : Orange, pay that back
ÎßÀËGÅ™ [COP] : KASOKUDO - excuse me?
KASOKUDO : he was auto busted
ÎßÀËGÅ™ [COP] : he went through pits at high speed
ÎßÀËGÅ™ [COP] : his fault
[6S] Byran [COP] : cuz he sped
ÎßÀËGÅ™ [COP] : yeah his FAULT
[6S] Byran [COP] : his own fault
KASOKUDO : then u just start again?
Luke™ [COP] : his fault
ÎßÀËGÅ™ [COP] : he went through pits HIGH SPEED
ÎßÀËGÅ™ [COP] : so dont tell me
Prophet™ [COP] : yea
KASOKUDO : yeah the first time
KASOKUDO : but why chase him again?
KASOKUDO : or did I see something wrong??
ÎßÀËGÅ™ [COP] : He was breaking rules, wanted to talk to him but he sped off
ÎßÀËGÅ™ [COP] : meaning speeding off= doesnt want to stop
ÎßÀËGÅ™ [COP] : then he went through pits at high speed and went over
ÎßÀËGÅ™ [COP] : pit speed limit
KASOKUDO : but still, I mean you can't just start a chase to talk man
ÎßÀËGÅ™ [COP] : his fault pal
KASOKUDO : one of those two fines was unfair
ÎßÀËGÅ™ [COP] : KASOKUDO - you his laywer?
KASOKUDO : let me check the replay, I don't wanna get anything wrong here
KASOKUDO : no
KASOKUDO : but rules are rules
[6S] Byran [COP] : replays dont show insim kasokudo
KASOKUDO : what's wrong with that?
[6S] Byran [COP] : we can def pull people over to tell them rules
[6S] Byran [COP] : depends on rules
[6S] Byran [COP] : the rule*