[TC] Gaming Forums

● Your LFS Username: goettler

● Time & Date of Incident: 2018-03-03 01:52:28

● Replay / Screenshot Link: don't have
● Replay Timestamps: don't have

● Reasons as to why you feel you deserve an unban:
I got a ban from TC Carl for Insim abuse / Exploiting for 365 days. Now the timer is at 218d. I got this ban, because i driven the road up and down up and down, always in the same rhythm (I dont drive any circles). I feel to deserve a unban, because it was honestly a really stupid and bad idea. There is a fair way to get a high bonus and much come in, without drive in a rhythm down and up the street.

---

Hi,

Could you explain further on how and why you were doing this? Were you using a script to achieve this kind of driving? Why did you ignore my requests to stop this systematic driving?

HI Carl,
i didn't use any script from the internet. Because i am a programmer, and really have fun to code some thing, I have seen it as a challenge to write a robot that drives independently. The Bonus income was only the price for it if it should work. I did not stop because I really wanted to finish it and yes it was very unfair and stupid that I did not stop when you said it.
I'm really sorry Carl.

Okay thanks for clearing this up, I appreciate it. In the future, when a [TC] member tells you to stop doing something, it's probably best to follow that instruction instead of arguing against them. I'd also like to make it fully clear that the use of any scripts or programs that either gain an advantage over other players or exploit anything within the insim is not allowed. If you're caught using any scripts or programs of that nature again you'll be permanently banned.

Since you've served a fair amount of your ban, I'll be happy to unban you if you agree that upon your return:

• You will not cheat/exploit the system by using scripts or programs to gain an unfair advantage.
• You will follow the rules @ tc-g.uk/rules. Your track record wasn't the best and I'd like to see that improve.
  

Please confirm below if you agree to this.

Yes, understood Carl