URS - Suggestion - Printable Version +- [TC] Gaming Forums (https://forum.city-driving.co.uk) +-- Forum: General Information (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: General Discussions (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +---- Forum: Server & InSim Suggestions (/forumdisplay.php?fid=13) +---- Thread: URS - Suggestion (/showthread.php?tid=17049) |
RE: URS - Suggestion - BP - 2015-04-19 11:13 (2015-04-19 11:00)Pipa Wrote: Awful idea. Absolutely right. People like Ph4nToM89 will be staring at a blank page. RE: URS - Suggestion - Ash - 2015-04-19 11:14 (2015-04-19 11:13)BP Wrote:(2015-04-19 11:00)Pipa Wrote: Awful idea. Sharing information from the URS = Kicked from the team. KTHXBAI RE: URS - Suggestion - BP - 2015-04-19 11:15 Crap. RE: URS - Suggestion - Ph4nToM - 2015-04-19 11:22 I was having a laugh at this thread knowing that my URS has to be empty as far as i remember. RE: URS - Suggestion - Ash - 2015-04-19 11:24 (2015-04-19 11:22)Ph4nToM Wrote: I was having a laugh at this thread knowing that my URS has to be empty as far as i remember. Would you like me to take the issue of BP further to TC Management? Lol RE: URS - Suggestion - Dino - 2015-04-19 11:52 Mine is empty too. On Topic: So actually after reading through the comments - probably it's not required to read his own URS, but maybe it's interesting for the person who gets banned why he gets banned for how long (history) Example: At my ever thing I did wrong (touching a cop who was in chase in roundabout, I had right of way), I immediately got a 3 day ban - others get tons of warnings before something like that.... What I wanna say is that I vote for a more clear way why someone gets banned, on the server its usually just like "Banned for ramming". Probably "Banned for ramming, 90 days, as it's your third URS entry regarding ramming. RE: URS - Suggestion - Pipa - 2015-04-19 12:12 (2015-04-19 11:52)Dino Wrote: What I wanna say is that I vote for a more clear way why someone gets banned, on the server its usually just like Server is not the place for long discussions or arguments as plenty of other people, that play the game, have no interest in listening to it. You can then come on the forum and discuss it with the admin, if you wish to do so. RE: URS - Suggestion - TigR - 2015-04-19 12:13 I dont really see why you are arguing about this. Its not gonna get thru just like all the other times.. RE: URS - Suggestion - Ash - 2015-04-19 12:16 (2015-04-19 12:13)TigR Wrote: I dont really see why you are arguing about this. Its not gonna get thru just like all the other times.. In my eyes this is nothing like an argument. Its good to debate and discuss. Thats what the whole point of discussion forums are RE: URS - Suggestion - Borja - 2015-04-19 13:38 And now,i apply for a team, and i just day "I havent been bamed".The leader of team , cant know it.Or "Yes, 1day", and were 1 year,but i dont remember it, and i cant check this. This is the only problem i found RE: URS - Suggestion - BP - 2015-04-19 13:40 (2015-04-19 13:38)Borja Wrote: And now,i apply for a team, and i just day "I havent been bamed".The leader of team , cant know it.Or "Yes, 1day", and were 1 year,but i dont remember it, and i cant check this. They should just be careful who they recruit. Of course they won't know every detail of the person's URS. However, if they actually know the person who they're letting into the team, they'll know if they're a trouble maker or not. If they were a trouble maker in 2012 they probably wouldn't remember, and wouldn't especially need to. RE: URS - Suggestion - KaraK - 2015-04-19 14:02 Could you please stop saying that there was never a problem not being able to see your URS? Come on, that's a really stupid argument. People want some transparency, they want to look at their record and be able to see their URS history. Transparency is not a bad thing. What Chuck says sounds right, and I don't see any major disadvantages about it. It's exactly what I had in mind when I wrote my previous reply. People might go around screaming "omg who reported me", but they'll never get to know, because that's confidential information for obvious reasons. (1970-01-02 15:42)Ash Wrote: In my eyes this is nothing like an argument. Its good to debate and discuss. Thats what the whole point of discussion forums are This RE: URS - Suggestion - Otava - 2015-04-19 14:08 (2015-04-19 13:40)BP Wrote:(2015-04-19 13:38)Borja Wrote: And now,i apply for a team, and i just day "I havent been bamed".The leader of team , cant know it.Or "Yes, 1day", and were 1 year,but i dont remember it, and i cant check this. Reminds of me, 2011 I belive RE: URS - Suggestion - KooKoo - 2015-04-19 15:20 -1. whats the point really? I cant see an advantage in this. RE: URS - Suggestion - Owl - 2015-04-19 17:56 (2015-04-19 11:52)Dino Wrote: Mine is empty too. Bull crap, I reported you and you got a warning twice. This is what I mean about peoe forgetting. That's why its useful to have at least an overview of your urs, I.e Bans and kicks. RE: URS - Suggestion - BP - 2015-04-19 18:01 (2015-04-19 17:56)Skoda Wrote:(2015-04-19 11:52)Dino Wrote: Mine is empty too. He was joking. RE: URS - Suggestion - Owl - 2015-04-19 18:02 Oh xD. Fair enough RE: URS - Suggestion - Nathan - 2015-04-19 18:15 Having seen and had access to the URS system in the past and now being Ex-TC its honestly as has been said before going to cause more harm than benefit. again reiterating previous statements it purely helps TC members to judge your overall behavior in the servers. A no from me. Its really not that interesting anyway. Perhaps another system ie traffic light system would be beneficial based on your behavior rather than seeing individual infractions. again benefit ? im not sure |