![]() |
Thread of Fail - Printable Version +- [TC] Gaming Forums (https://forum.city-driving.co.uk) +-- Forum: Community Area (/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Off-Topic Chat (/forumdisplay.php?fid=15) +--- Thread: Thread of Fail (/showthread.php?tid=179) |
Thread of Fail - Kayla - 2011-10-11 02:52 The good old Thread of Fail i'll start: Installing second HDD + Reinstalling Windows: took 8 hrs and lost 2 S-ATA plugs on my Mainboard Second Fail: Naming this thread "Thrad of Fail" xD RE: Thrad of Fail - KennyAE86 - 2011-10-11 03:01 How are u gonna spell the thread of fail wrong? RE: Thread of Fail - Vee - 2011-10-13 19:33 RE: Thread of Fail - McGherkin - 2011-10-13 19:39 I hate that guy, thank God Mercs are bulletproof. RE: Thread of Fail - Crille - 2011-10-24 20:18 ![]() RE: Thread of Fail - Kyllone - 2011-10-25 18:29 ![]() ![]() RE: Thread of Fail - Pipa - 2011-10-25 20:16 Against crille and mikee? Oh brad. Edit: lol at that m.ikee mikee mikee mikee mikee RE: Thread of Fail - Vee - 2011-10-27 21:22 Insurance scam fail ![]() RE: Thread of Fail - BP - 2011-10-27 21:27 LOL VEE, epic. EDIT: Why is there no swear filter for 'f***ing'? RE: Thread of Fail - McGherkin - 2011-10-27 23:35 Because they used all the swear filter's capacity filtering McGherkin, mikee and VTEC RE: Thread of Fail - Pete - 2011-10-27 23:43 It is in the swear filter. RE: Thread of Fail - Fujioshi - 2011-10-28 00:05 (2011-10-27 23:35)McGherkin Wrote: Because they used all the swear filter's capacity filtering Dat guy datz in ur forumz, spammin' all ur threadz, would've made a great signature, to bad its >225 characters RE: Thread of Fail - BP - 2011-10-28 08:43 Lamp, f*** is in the swearfilter, but f***ing isn't ![]() RE: Thread of Fail - KaraK - 2011-10-28 09:19 Should put a wildcard (*) in it. So the swear filter entry should be *<swear>*, and that way it'd filter f*cking too. Which it doesn't, atm. RE: Thread of Fail - Johan. - 2011-10-28 10:32 Did you just fail to swear, KaraK? ![]() RE: Thread of Fail - Stevo - 2011-10-28 12:07 But that's just avoiding the swear filter isn't it? Which is against forum rules ![]() RE: Thread of Fail - Johan. - 2011-10-28 13:15 He edited his fail away xD RE: Thread of Fail - KaraK - 2011-10-28 15:07 (2011-10-28 12:07)Stevo Wrote: But that's just avoiding the swear filter isn't it? Which is against forum rules No, I mean that that should be the swear filter entry in the ACP ![]() Otherwise it would be avoiding the swear filter. They didn't put a wildcard in it. ![]() So now *Removed* is filtered, f*cking isn't. Just because 'ing' was added, the swear filter doesnt recognise it as a swear. (2011-10-28 13:15)Johan. Wrote: He edited his fail away xD Wasn't a fail, just wasn't explained properly. I bet still not everyone will understand what I'm saying though x) RE: Thread of Fail - David - 2011-10-29 11:25 ![]() Uploaded with ImageShack.us RE: Thread of Fail - Makee - 2011-10-29 11:55 ![]() |