RB at the safezone "unused pit" - Printable Version +- [TC] Gaming Forums (https://forum.city-driving.co.uk) +-- Forum: General Information (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: General Discussions (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Thread: RB at the safezone "unused pit" (/showthread.php?tid=21332) |
RB at the safezone "unused pit" - MartyLouis - 2016-01-29 13:51 Hey all, I think drifting can be kind of fun. But some people go drift around the RB. What do you think of the idea of making another RB thing (just the circle thing) in a safezone like the Pitlane at the Kyoto ring? So people can drift around that without getting banned or whatever. So the question: Do you think there should be another RB circle thing at the pitlane at the kyoto ring? RE: RB at the safezone "unused pit" - Thomas - 2016-01-29 14:03 No. Head to the shopping mall, theres a blue tyre stack one can drift around without disturbing people, plus it's a road barely used these days. RE: RB at the safezone "unused pit" - VirtualTourist - 2016-01-29 14:06 (2016-01-29 14:03)Thomas Wrote: No. But then who would ever see the drifting skills? RE: RB at the safezone "unused pit" - Adorable - 2016-01-29 14:08 (2016-01-29 14:06)VirtualTourist Wrote:(2016-01-29 14:03)Thomas Wrote: No. We can see ramming skills RE: RB at the safezone "unused pit" - Razz - 2016-01-29 14:12 (2016-01-29 14:03)Thomas Wrote: No. I agree. Chases also go on in SZ2 and I'm sure cops don't want to be slowing down or being obstructed by drifters drifting the RB. I think it would be a chaos since its counted as a "stunt" zone. -1 RE: RB at the safezone "unused pit" - VirtualTourist - 2016-01-29 14:27 (2016-01-29 14:08)Mr.AD Wrote:(2016-01-29 14:06)VirtualTourist Wrote:(2016-01-29 14:03)Thomas Wrote: No. I don't follow. Expand. RE: RB at the safezone "unused pit" - KooKoo - 2016-01-29 14:43 I think TC reached the objects limit. RE: RB at the safezone "unused pit" - Borja - 2016-01-29 14:51 No. Works nice as how is working now RE: RB at the safezone "unused pit" - Razz - 2016-01-29 16:07 (2016-01-29 14:27)VirtualTourist Wrote:(2016-01-29 14:08)Mr.AD Wrote:(2016-01-29 14:06)VirtualTourist Wrote:(2016-01-29 14:03)Thomas Wrote: No. That's all :/ RE: RB at the safezone "unused pit" - VirtualTourist - 2016-01-29 16:50 (2016-01-29 16:07)N Power Wrote:(2016-01-29 14:27)VirtualTourist Wrote:(2016-01-29 14:08)Mr.AD Wrote:(2016-01-29 14:06)VirtualTourist Wrote:(2016-01-29 14:03)Thomas Wrote: No. Makes sense. RE: RB at the safezone "unused pit" - Tingle - 2016-01-29 16:51 Drifters are the Ebola of drivers - they need to be wiped out, but your idea just doesn't coincide with this. It's a no from me. RE: RB at the safezone "unused pit" - KaraK - 2016-01-29 19:58 It's actually a good idea, but I don't think it's practical due to reasons described above. |