+ Report - some users (Report Archived by Brad) - Printable Version +- [TC] Gaming Forums (https://forum.city-driving.co.uk) +-- Forum: [TC] CityDriving (/forumdisplay.php?fid=24) +--- Forum: Server Administration Tasks (/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +---- Forum: Users Reporting (/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +----- Forum: User Reports - Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=35) +----- Thread: + Report - some users (Report Archived by Brad) (/showthread.php?tid=23673)

+ Report - some users (Report Archived by Brad) - Adrian - 2016-08-30 14:48 Your LFS username: 9XxAdrianxX9 Their LFS username(s): PtFox, xDvLz, 3rb9_f16, xxbythomassxx Their in-game nickname(s): FinnishMafia, ! D V L Z, i 3rb9, [JJT] ›Tomasin‹ Main reason(s): Ignoring sirens and causing a crash because of it Replay and/or screenshot link: 1 - https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B76ZGcVLxc9HbVZvRWc3Z1NhYVk 2 - https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B76ZGcVLxc9HUHQwbkFJU09JUEE Replay timestamps: From 1st replay: 25:40 - FinnishMafia is ignoring sirens and overtake chase 25:43 - ! D V L Z is ignoring sirens and causing crash when trying to overtake chase. Causes me to lost my suspect. From 2nd replay: 13:14 - FinnishMafia ignoring sirens again, crashes into me, no apology for it. Caused me to lost suspect. 13:23 - i 3rb9 ignoring sirens (road laws also) and caused crash with me, no apology for it 13:27 - [JJT] ›Tomasin‹ ignoring sirens (and road laws), almost cause crash with me too Description of incident (inc date & time): It was today (30.08). First replay saved about 15:20 (UK time), second - 15:50 (UK time). In first replay I was chasing per, in second - [GLOW] Angel. Other informations are above. EDIT: Added 2nd replay and needed informations. Status: Investigation Process. Updated by: Brad. - Brad - 2016-08-31 18:09 This report is being looked into. Please be patient. Hi, first report link is broken. I'll begin looking at the second. i 3rb9 was banned for 60 days. Although it was relatively minor, his history of this kind of this is extensive. I don't necessarily think action is required for the other two--in the first instance he probably should have yielded although on the other hand you did approach at a point where he may not have been able to see / react in time and a little more caution from your part could have been taken. In the second instance, you weren't moving when he approached and he took the chance. He was lucky, though. Thanks for the report. Action has been taken as described. Thank you for your report. It has now been moved to the archives.