!stats including Crashes - Printable Version +- [TC] Gaming Forums (https://forum.city-driving.co.uk) +-- Forum: General Information (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: General Discussions (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +---- Forum: Server & InSim Suggestions (/forumdisplay.php?fid=13) +---- Thread: !stats including Crashes (/showthread.php?tid=2382) |
!stats including Crashes - Kayla - 2012-03-10 14:57 Heya, i just wondered how many crashes I've had, since we have a Top Crashers list, how about including the Crash Number in !stats? Since i'm not on the list, i can't see how many crashs i've had until now. =/ RE: !stats including Crashes - Jedi - 2012-03-10 14:59 Good suggestion Also it would be nice to have all top 20/50 increased to top 100 RE: !stats including Crashes - ZsoLT - 2012-03-10 15:00 +1 to both idea RE: !stats including Crashes - Turkey - 2012-03-10 15:31 +1 to both RE: !stats including Crashes - Stunna - 2012-03-10 15:53 I don't know about you all but last time I checked crashing is not a good thing. -1 from me. RE: !stats including Crashes - Kayla - 2012-03-10 16:00 it doesn't mean it's a good thing, but if we get a Top Crasher's List, it would also be interesting to know how often you did crash .. not for saying stuff like "oh, i only crashed 150 times, just 20 left for place number 1!!!" but for curiousity and i just suggest it, because i think it's not that much work to implement RE: !stats including Crashes - Turkey - 2012-03-10 16:10 (2012-03-10 15:53)Stunna Wrote: I don't know about you all but last time I checked crashing is not a good thing. -1 from me. I think the chances of this making people collect crash stats are extreemly unlikely. People may sarcasticly congratulate drivers at the top of the crash list, but I don't know anyone who sees it as a genuine achivement. RE: !stats including Crashes - ChrisM - 2012-03-11 01:01 Was thinking of exactly this the other day on the server. +1. RE: !stats including Crashes - Pipa - 2012-03-11 01:15 Sounds good to me, would also like to know that. RE: !stats including Crashes - KaraK - 2012-03-11 11:07 I like both. RE: !stats including Crashes - Kieran - 2012-03-11 19:08 +1 to both |