Removing speedbump on Lower Bayside

[Thomas]

Hello,

Is it possible that the speedbump on Lower Bayside can be removed, or atleast lowered? At the moment you can't avoid flying over it at any speeds higher then 20 km/h. Thus creating a lot of dangerous and careless situations.

[[TC]►Bez◄]

Would you over speed and fly over a speed bump in your car in the real world? No is the answer, so don't fly over this one.

[[TC]►Carl◄]

It needs to be smoother. Not even the ones in Asda car park are that brutal!


I know the whole idea is to calm the traffic but that just isn't smooth imo.

[Jimmy]

Ehm yes.

[◄Chuck►]

Very realistic: https://youtu.be/FtK-lKRaA0A?t=32
Check the Gallardo

However, its only purpose was to add a bit fun and make that spot more interesting. Which it did. But it only was temporary and is not part of the layout.
I wouldn't actually mind having it added permanently.

[SO•Yukine]

I wouldn't mind having some of them, but a bit lower.

[Ehet]

(2016-06-18 18:39)Jimmy Wrote:  Ehm yes.

Thats a roundabout and not a speedbump

[SO•Yukine]

I agree. Jimmy's representation is not accurate.

Spoiler (Click to View)

[[TC-R] Adam]

I love the idea of these. I suggest that they would work much better round South City and Westhill as they are both actual roads that might need speed bumps. As Yukine said, lower them down a bit and they would work well.

[[TC] Stephen]

They should stay the same imo, speed humps are there to make you slow down.

Solution, slow down.

[◄Chuck►]

For those who missed the action or missing it now )

[[TC]►Spark◄]

Please bring it back.

[Thomas]

(2016-06-19 08:24)Stephen Wrote:  They should stay the same imo, speed humps are there to make you slow down.

Solution, slow down.

Surely placing a speedbump the size of Mt. Everest on a 120 km/h road is a horrible idea?

The whole purpose of a speedbump is to ensure that the speedlimit is respected. Therefor this speedbump should be balanced in a way that allows people to drive over it at that speed.

And as Chuck greatly demonstrated in his video above, it causes a tonne of unnecessary chaos, in the way that it is currently (or rather was).

[[TC]►Carl◄]

I agree with Thomas, I'm all for the speed bump but I've never witnessed a speed bump where you have to reduce your speed by 80% to prevent your car from going airborne. It's like placing a speed bump on a motorway, you just don't do it. I would like to see that speed bump back as it was ideal because it was close to a braking zone anyway, but it was just too pointy to stay.

But anyways those speed bumps were just for fun at the time aha.

[SO•Yukine]

If speedbumps were about to pop at strategic places, I propose to make lower and larger ones.
It would permit a smoother transition.

E.g speed bumps for road crossings.

[[6S] Jacob]

(2016-06-19 10:26)Chuck Wrote:  For those who missed the action or missing it now )

There has never been so much trafic before. Ppl go there so much and then they are asking for removing it...

[GOOMB]

don't remove its so fun everyone goes to that road just for the speedbump