Rule clarification

[Pipa]

(2014-08-02 16:20)KaraK Wrote:  The word "accordingly" may point to choosing the right fine, but how it comes across to me is that it points to choosing a fine related to the incident, and not about the amount. And even if it does point to the fine, there is nothing about this in the rules, finelist or in-game finelist; the documents which are enforced. Something which used to be there, and, if it should still be enforced, should again be added in my opinion.

Well obviously we could add another rule, but to me this one is pretty self explanatory and does not need another addition.

Most fines are split into 3 categories [Low - Medium - High], it is up to you decide wether or not something qualifies as for example a low/small crash or goes beyond that.

That system has worked pretty well in the past and hardly anyone made any big mistakes. The only times i have seen people fine excessive amounts was mostly out of spite and to abuse that feature to get back at somebody. And if we notice that behaviour then we will correct it with a warning.

If they fail to respect that warning then they will be banned for system abuse, as they are using a feature for something that it was not intended for. May that be bullying another person or quickly getting money.

I really wouldn't worry about it, as i have not witnessed one incident where a person choose the wrong fine by accident. Maybe small mistakes, but nothing that actually requires an admin to intervene. They only needed a little help with the system, defintion or translation.