Statistical analysis of the reports archive

[Barney [CA]]

"[You smart .I; appreciate that.]™" - [GLOW]Antonio, 2016.

You'll apply for TC? Just curious. I like statistics, great stuff. Interesting would have also been the amount of reports depending on the track. KY and SO(followed by BW) might have the most would be my assumption, but guess thats hard to figure with the old rotationshedules not availiable. But might be an idea for 2016 only.

(2016-06-06 03:26)Tingle Wrote:  Do some admins have a bias towards which reports they take on? Or is it simply that some admins are more/less lenient than others?

That has been on my mind for quite some time. I guess some admins prefer handling "more simple" reports. Sometimes you can witness longer reports(or by/towards certain users) being untouched for several days, while newer reports get handled quickly. Also it MIGHT be that certain topics are thought to be handled by certain people. E.g. cop-related reports used to be handled often by Saph, now by Connor(and Luke). Can only guess if this is a personal preference of the admins, or something like an internal guideline. Maybe just coincidence or im just wrong.

Although no major surprises(some exceptions) very interesting imho. gj