Unban - dmcmsn (Ban Reduced by Dracula)

[Old Engine]

(2016-08-26 13:37)Dracula Wrote:  First off, it's not 65 days just because of the incidents seen there, it's also because I have incremented from prior bans, for example your 30 day ban very recently.

In regards to the brake checking incident - it's not just the brake-checking, which I wouldn't have had a major issue otherwise. It's the fact you did it maliciously to provoke the cop by threatening reports and acting as if he was in the wrong from you slamming your brakes on in front of him.

As for it being against the rules, in my eyes it pretty simply falls under this:

Rules Wrote:1.2. Do not crash or ram other cars deliberately.
This includes negligent and reckless driving, provoking accidents, for example blocking the track, doing stunts or doughnuts on the road and so on.

This is my reasoning, and I stand by my decisions.
I won't close the thread yet incase you have any other comments.

Not trying to argue with you here but, I totally disagree with brake checking falling under rule 1.2. As I my self am not 'ramming' or 'crashing' into the other cars. It's the cop that is crashing into me for not maintaining a safe distance as taught in the Basic training.

Also me saying things like 'ram' and 'report' to cops are not to provoke them. I've learned about provoking from the last ban you mentioned.
Me saying 'ram' and 'report' is not to provoke it is simply my method to distract the cop in the hope that they'll loose concentration when trying to respond back. It's not to provoke them it's simply to distract them.
While I understand that there was more to the report than just brake check. Brake checking was the main issue here and I've had 3 reports for it.

I still don't believe it falls under rule 1.2. So if you still disagree with me and with what I've mentioned above. Would it be possible to get another admin to take a look over this and have their opinion on it?

Thanks.