- Giorgi Tevzadse, Saab 9-3 Aero 250hp(Rynno666) (Archived by Brad)

[Barney [CA]]

(2016-10-22 12:47)Brad Wrote:  0:25 Stops on road, trying to provoke an accident How do you know what his intentions were? Looks to me that he was warming his tyres

Experience. He is well known for this kind of behaviour. As a single incident this is not even worth to mention. But looking at the whole puzzle, it just fits in perfectly.

---

(2016-10-22 12:47)Brad Wrote:  2:15 Causing an accident. Apology needs to be disregarded, as on purpose. Again, why do you say the apology needs to be disregarded? This was a minor collision between two drivers (none of which is yourself), in which both parties apologised

See above. An apologie only makes sense for accidents, not for hits on purpose. Why on earth would he suddenly go wrongside at the same time someone tries to overtake him? Coincidence?

---

(2016-10-22 12:47)Brad Wrote:  2:38 Performs a PIT on other driver

13:50 Causing a collision, threatening GMB, blaming him
Goes ahead talking nonsense, making BP look into it, being told it was entirely his fault. Still threatening GMB. - 50:50 in my opinion; GMB did steer to the left, and Rynno tried an ambitious overtake

Ambitious is expressed kind of friendly... It reckless. Thats a single lane with armcos and not a spot to overtake. You cant seriously blame GMB for that a single bit. I got a warning for far far less,

gif (Click to View)

even though the other driver decided not to brake(for the roundabout he would have needed to start braking around 30m earlier) and turned right into me on purpose. I'm the right car overtaking obviously.

---

(2016-10-22 12:47)Brad Wrote:  33:33 Ignoring sirens, blocking COP, honking at him. Rules clearly state to leave room for COPs to manoeuvre, not to drive up their ass and prevent them from reversing. He reversed when he saw the cop attempting to reverse and the cop thanked him for it "ty"

He shouldnt have gotten into that position in the first place. Rule "1.5. Stay away from chases. Let suspects and cops pass and give them room for manoeuvring." Did he give room? No, he started honking and got as close as he could. He even released brakes to get to the bumper. Is that how we can/are supposed to behave in case of sirens?

---

(2016-10-22 12:47)Brad Wrote:  38:14 Honking, coming close, trying to block me, hitting me and Street - It was a little too close, however it looked like you made contact with the rear of his car slightly which contributed to him hitting Street

I almost have no words for this: "you made contact". Seriously. He switched lanes, steering left, drove over the white line, and started to release throttle and then even apllies brakes.

pic (Click to View)

---

(2016-10-22 12:47)Brad Wrote:  [*]43:43 Trying to provoke an accident by brake-checking Completely disagree

Shame. It was just lucky that i went into pitlane. Or can we randomly do emergency brakes with cars close behind? What do you think his intentions were?

---

(2016-10-22 12:47)Brad Wrote:  44:22 Switching lanes, PITting me, causing a heavy accident.
Basically the same he did to GMB and he got told to be at fault. Keeps talking nonsense, blocking the road. He probably shouldn't have tried such an ambitious move again-I agree-however it's relatively minor due to the fact that you could have moved across slightly to the right?

We are not obliged to give room in a single lane. That were kind of the words the admin gave me with the warning. Its just ridicolous to try to overtake in that spot. Especially after the first GMB-incident was just 30min ago and BP told him he was at fault. Its not minor at all. He pushed me in the barrier and i could have easily gone flying to the moon/oob.

---

(2016-10-22 12:47)Brad Wrote:  May I ask if you have any personal issues with this user? I'd say 1 or 2 of the above time-stamps are slightly valid in terms of them being avoidable, but the rest have absolutely no basis what-so-ever.

I kind of do have an issue. Since my first day on TC this user is showing exactly this kind of behaviour. Day after day. Every accident itself is not really major, but all in all its provocing accidents and the sheer huge amount of incidents just show the character. Have you had a look at the other reports?
http://forum.city-driving.co.uk/showthre...?tid=14121
http://forum.city-driving.co.uk/showthre...?tid=15689
http://forum.city-driving.co.uk/showthre...?tid=21741

Dont you see a pattern here? Yes thats all in the past, and now hes grown up and mature and a new person.

---

(2016-10-22 12:47)Brad Wrote:  ...that driving close to others consistently may be seen to be aggressive / provocative.

For the exact same driving he has gotten dozens of warnings and bans. It IS consistent and has to be seen provocative.