- forcHma - Report (Report Archived by Spark)
|
2018-01-28, 19:53
Post: #1
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
- forcHma - Report (Report Archived by Spark)
Your LFS username: smallhail741
Their LFS username(s): forcHma Their in-game nickname(s): [COP]forcHma Main reason(s): Moving & Illegal Roadblock Replay and/or screenshot link: http://www.mediafire.com/file/la9c4xp6oo...r+tazx.mpr (Thanks Ephwurd) Replay timestamps: Timestamps are relative, normally starts a few seconds before point of interest. 1:56:40 Joins chase, places roadblock shortly after. Small conversation straight after roadblock. 2:01:20 - notable response from forcHma here, I pause chase with other cop and try and try and make my point of the command of a roadblock was used and he drove whilst I was in sight. 2:02:54 - Roba makes a very good comment of why was the command used if not a roadblock (chat logs will show at some point he stated it was not a block) 2:03:33 - Roba states it was not requested or informed in cop chat, therefore making it a random roadblock which would be against 4.5 if not requested. 2:08:25 - Chase ends, very slow and annoying dialect begins. until around 2:28-ish (Chat logs would probably be better for this) - forcHma states at some point in this time that there was no problem with what he did, and even after being informed of stuff from the cop guide, still believed he was not in the wrong... His attitude towards the situation, especially when I said I didn't think it was report worthy was inadequate at best... Hence why I've since decided to bring this to attention as it is to get some closure. Description of incident (inc date & time): 18:05 GMT (ish) 28/01/2018 forcHma joined the chase about 5 seconds before the block was placed just before the entrance to Pit Lane 1; I was at the top of the road on this time. He then proceeded to wait a second or two before proceeding to move into the road, stopping and then typing !rb+ 8 to have a block in front of him... This was not requested by cop 1 (as far as I'm aware, I did ask.) and looking from his view, he was at a complete stop, right before I came into view, he put his foot down and drove through his block. When asked about the block after the chase, his comments were that it was not a problem or a roadblock as he had not positioned himself in the way. He did not seem to be interested either in the fact he had then broken the rules to move when I was in sight (claimed he had stopped, was down at like 1-3MPH for 0.5 seconds until I went past.) Before I had read the server rules I was under the assumption that the cop guide (which in some cases are quoted more than the Server Rules in reference to copping) was quite unclear, although now reading the rules, it shows that no matter the situation the whole roadblock was illegal. PLEASE READ BEFORE REVIEWING: This in my opinion is less of a report, more of a disagreement regarding the rules. In this situation, forcHma has claimed that although there was no roadblock requested his roadblock was legal (the guide does not quite disagree nor agree) and there was quite a few conflicting opinions on the server, with even b e n n i (lamerr) stating that if you're in the chase you can roadblock without request. Neither rules nor the guide say otherwise, however if to take this sentence "Other units inside or outside of the chase may set up roadblocks upon request of the cops within the chase." (Manual - https://world.city-driving.co.uk/?page=m...lice_guide) literally, you would work on the theory that unless requested it's not legal. I believe Rule 4.5 does clarify it a bit more in the sense of, if it's not requested it's not legal, but the guide is a bit of a grey area, to the point of where experienced veteran cops (in this case, b e n n i) believes that a roadblock of the sort shown in replay, is legal. Now I am definitely not contesting that his movement after placing the block was legal, for that it most definitely was not, under any circumstances... I'm just hoping that for the sake of mine and other members sanity, that the rules be clarified, especially in this situation. Sorry for the massive essay on this, but I feel that if un-clarified could create a mindset of "oh the rules are unclear, I'll do it" within TC. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
- forcHma - Report (Report Archived by Spark) - TAZxx - 2018-01-28 19:53
Status: Investigation Process. Updated by: Spark. - Spark - 2018-01-28, 22:56
RE: forcHma - Report - Spark - 2018-01-29, 17:57
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group