Failure to move for sirens

[Tingle]

Thank you for clarifying.

So from what I can take from this is;

1) The reason 'failure to move for sirens' was removed is because it is always enforced as a server rule.

2) Driving on the wrong side is not always a breach of a server rule and so it remains a finable offence.

3) The reason for 'causing an accident' remaining as a fine is because it is not always a breach of a server rule.

However, I find point 3) questionable given the rule seems to be quite all-encompassing; it covers the provoking of accidents, crashes caused by negligent and reckless driving as well as deliberate ramming.

(2019-08-08 08:51)Chuck Wrote:  Also, causing an accident does not necessarily mean to be physically involved. It is quite possible that someone causes an accident, e.g. by ignoring the right of way, and causes two other cars to collide.

Even this example here would surely fall under the provocation of an accident or at least reckless driving? The rule does not seem to explicitly mention physical involvement (perhaps this is where I am misunderstanding what has been said so far).

So despite this all-encompassing definition of the rule, it is still possible to cause an accident without being in breach of it?