Suggestions for Safety Rating feature

[SIMOX]

(2022-10-23 05:05)Chuck Wrote:  Sure, you will always get "unfair" hits. Its part of the deal. It was never the goal to keep 100% for everyone. The goal was rather to detect the tendency whether someone is a risk or not.


If you look at these two candidates here, you will agree that there must be something "wrong" with them. You can't blame such a rating purely on "unfair" hits.
And I think its a valid thought, that such people should not be allowed to use the Königsegg, for instance. Not until they've sorted their driving at least.

Yes you right i wrecked myself to 27% on purpose because i wasnt able to drive my bikes anymore without getting ww hit. Very fun when you get hit and SR drops below 90% then i take slow bike, gain it back, pick fast bike again, get ww again, drop below 90 again get speced, pick slow bike again, get ww on slow bike, grind even longer to 90%, then pick fast bike and then get hit again so SR is below 90% AGAIN. At that point i stopped giving a shit and just messed around.

Im not interested in driving slow cars to farm money because i dont need money. I got enough unlike pvl. And even then whats the point in spending 200k on a car if you wont be able to use it most of the time. This track is not even crash intensive like aston, south city or kyoto.

Point is, there should be no restrictions for vehicles because its simply not fun when you cant play with the car you like just because some donkey crashed into you. I told you that i gone from 72% to 0% on westhill retro by using just bike and driving normally. Was i messing? No, did i cause any trouble? Any ruined chases? Not really. It just showed how bullshit this system is and that it doesnt really work. Yes i like driving bikes fast so what? Am i not supposed to? Is this [TC] No Fun Allowed server?

Only adds toxicity to server, nothing else. Oh and btw, above 30% can drive trucks so good job on that. Surely bike can do more damage than a truck right? Lmao.