Bimmy m46 v10 restriction change

[RevLeon]

(2023-03-29 23:29)Felipe Jardim Wrote:  The old Bimmy 46 had 297bhp/ton and no one had a problem with it. This thing has close to 500hp now i dont see why less restriction is needed.

I'm not an expert when it comes to downforce so I won't comment much on that except that I don't think it makes that much of a difference since I already said even tho they have less downforce are still faster.
(After doing a bit of quick testing the bimmy reaches the end of Highway 1 at 260kph, the only other car that is at 260 or under is GT-V34 Mine9. In fast most of the cars actually reach 200kmh before the bimmy does)

The old bimmy had 297bhp/ton, yes but it also had more grip than this version which compensated a lot, and with 297bhp/tn it was still just as quick as this but with much more grip. Also the old bimmy had no restrictions on it so there wasn't much to complain about.

Can you please explain to me how rounding up 345bph/ton is equal to almost 500bhp? With my proposed 23%-25% it would be between 399bhp and 383bhp respectively. You're either looking at the wrong car or you're ignoring the 30% restrictions which I'm talking about.

(2023-03-30 00:27)A n a n s i Wrote:  Jardim has explained it well. Also I believe that the Audda R4S and the GT-V34 Mine's should have a similar treatment in terms of minimum restriction, same reasons overall to what Jardim explained.

If you think he explained it well you must also not have had a drive with the car or looked at the wrong car since you're agreeing with wrong numbers. If you're saying that the others should be also restricted similarly to the bimmy that would also close the gap in terms of performance difference between the cars and that would also be fine but I thought it would be easier to take 5-7% off one car than calculate it for 10+ different cars.