Idle system improvement

[porez]

maybe there is another solution about overcrowded server.
I would devide lfs tracks in [tc] community into:
*v. popular (Montana, Kyoto)
*v. popular but smaller (Fern Bay, Westhill)
*not popular (South City, Blackwood)

Where I aim...
to reduce the gap in connections on servers (s1/32, s2/0-5) maybe try set a similar tracks on both servers?
Presently we got Kyoto/SO... its obvious that 95+% will try to join server with Kyoto map.
The second server mostly is empty. But people still try to connect to S.One. Why? City is small, boring, it's hard to drive more than 50-100kms there...
But... if we would have i.e. Fern Bay/Westhill instead SO on 2nd server maybe people will think "hmm... Kyoto is full, it's hard to join it... Maybe I'll give a try to join second server? Damn almost empty :/ But... fern bay/westhill is still nice to cruise and (what's more in compare with SO, BL) there is much more probability that in a few mins few other ppl will join this server and drive some distance."

Maybe this solution will cause that both servers will be full (or almost).
I bet that if we had FE/WE on second server from 24.12 there both servers will be full and people instead making 30mins attempts to join Kyoto would join S.Two.
Sry for grammar xD
Cheers