+ Report - Lancaster (Report Archived by Turbo)

[itskibo]

● Your LFS Username: itsKibo

● Their LFS Username(s): Lancaster
● Their LFS GameName(s): [MET]Oli[COP]

● Replay and/or Screenshot Link: http://www.myupload.dk/showfile/1ZcYr9Tat.mpr
● Replay Timestamps:
18:25 I spin out, nearly not moving, he decides to hit my front.
19:00 same as 18:25
19:50 hits my front again and drives further
20:40 dangerous move in an attempt to stop me, causing us both to crash.
21:40 pits me, then force speeds into me to ''push'' me to the side of the road like I'm some kind of cheap toy...
22:00 tries to pit me, I hit civilian and so did he.
22:35 hits me again like I'm a cheap toy...
24:15 pushes me onto wrong lane with oncoming civilian...
25:05 I spin out again, he tries to force push me into the wall once again.
26:20 hits me in my back causing me to lose control (really no way to correct it) and sent me into a barrier causing me to fly. He didn't say sorry while he was at fault.
After this an argument with his... miserable driving...


● Description of incident (inc Date & Time)
Ramming, pushing me onto wrong lane with civilian oncoming, trying to pit me but instead hits civilian car with me

[Lancaster]

1. I'm always paying compensation if I do ram someone.

2. Those where legitimate pit manoeuvres.

3. It would ask me to pay compensation if I did ram you, yes cops do get it during chases.

4. If I have hit you make sure you look at how much I'm braking,
I prefer to keep a pursuit going because it makes for more fun for the police and the suspect.

[itskibo]

(2012-06-07 22:13)Lancaster Wrote:  1. I'm always paying compensation if I do ram someone.

2. Those where legitimate pit manoeuvres.

3. It would ask me to pay compensation if I did ram you, yes cops do get it during chases.

4. If I have hit you make sure you look at how much I'm braking,
I prefer to keep a pursuit going because it makes for more fun for the police and the suspect.

1. compensation doesn't show up when you hit the suspect.
2. pit manoeuvre? Lol...
3. same as 1
4. that's off topic.

3 has been confirmed by TC admins.

[Lancaster]

Your points are invalid and wrong, I'm not going to spam this topic with a petty argument.

</thread>

[itskibo]

(2012-06-07 22:20)Lancaster Wrote:  Your points are invalid and wrong, I'm not going to spam this topic with a petty argument.

</thread>

Yet the TC admins have claimed that the ''compensation'' does NOT show up when you hit your suspect.
It's in the replay when they say it.

[Turbo]

How about you guys stop arguing and let me deal with it?

---

This report is being looked into. Please be patient.

---

Alright.

18:25 - Lancaster barely touched you. You were going too fast and tried to drift the towngate and ended up going on the hill.
19:00 and 19:50 - Not what I'd call anything more than light force.
20:40 - Yes, Lancaster's manouver was a bit untimed and poorly executed but not worthy of losing cop rights over.
21:40 - Nothing wrong with that PIT Manouver.
22:00 - I'd say the civilian was at fault for being stopped in the middle of the road.
22:35 - Again, Nothing wrong with that PIT.
24:15 - You didn't even hit the civilian............
25:05 - Nothing wrong with the force he used there.
26:20 - Ok, That was a bit too hard.


My decision on the report is as follows.

I will not be revoking Lancaster's COP Rights BUT i will be putting a note on Lancaster's URS regarding his occasions of force being too hard.

---

Action has been taken as described.

Thank you for your report.

It has now been moved to the archives.