change Server 2 to a other track

[G B]

hi,
well the title says it already. can you guys change one server to a other track as sydney please. i have fps probs with that map.
thanks in advance.

[Orange™]

I don't have any problems with the FPS on track but i know many do. Hoshi was saying it too.

[Cola]

+1 from here.

[Iceman]

+1 for this idea!

[Dan]

+1 don't like Sydney so would be nice for another map

[Chill .]

+1 from me actually . FPS is so low and i dont like to drive with low FPS .

[Johan.]

I would more put GB's suggestion onto another road: stop using the second server as backup-server, and just use the regular swap of map every week, like on server one, on it again.

[Seven]

+1 Johan

[Dowpy]

Sydney is complete shit so +1

[[TC] Brad]

I think it is probably to encourage people to use Sydney, otherwise people will go for the "easier" track, i.e. Montana or Westhill.

[Savy]

go get a better pc and problem solved, your pc must be shit if you can't even get decent fps on sydney

Plus people need all the help they can get with driving as most people suck, always fun to see people moan about sydney when they can't drive around a corner at 30mph yet they always wanted the autobahn ":D"

[[TC]►Ras◄]

I dont know why people always assume other people dont want Sydney because its "hard" and they cant drive on it. I for example dont have a problem driving on Sydney, i dont fail more than on any other track, etc etc, i just dont like Sydney as much as the other tracks for reasons im not even sure about, but im guessing it has something to do with the size (not because of narrow roads but because there are few roads compared to some of the other tracks)

It can be a fun track at times, though, but having an alternative would be preferable.

But yeah, +1 to OP.

[[TC]►Nick◄]

I personally love Sydney. My turd of a laptop can run around 28fps which is plenty to cope with driving. If you're getting less, stop playing LFS on a calculator.

I don't fail any more on Sydney, I'm just rubbish everywhere. If anything, I do better on Sydney. It's a lot more fun for chases and such.

I wouldn't like to see it changed. Sydney is better the more players are on it. Most people would flock to another map, leaving Sydney as a ghost town yet again.

[Savy]

Well Ras, when you see people complain about Sydney then you spectate them and watch them drive. It kind of explains why they hate the track when they can't even do 1corner without crashing or hitting something.

[[TC] Brad]

(2013-02-17 15:17)Nick Wrote:  I wouldn't like to see it changed. Sydney is better the more players are on it. Most people would flock to another map, leaving Sydney as a ghost town yet again.

Exactly.

[Tommer]

If your PC is having FPS problems with Sydney it's time to update that outdated hardware. This is 2013 and LFS people.

People claiming its unfair because they don't enjoy the track, well, the track cycles every 2 weeks. 90% of the time there is a track you will happily go to. By putting Sydney on both of the servers for 2 weeks you allow the people who enjoy a full Sydney to get a full Sydney, just as [TC] allows you to enjoy a full Montana or Jamaica for 2 weeks at a time.

If you don't like the track nobody is making you play on LFS and it won't kill you to not be able to drive your personal preference for a couple of weeks. If the track is too 'difficult' well slow the heck down geez.

[Johan.]

Uhhh Tommer, we live in 2013, maps are changed every week

[Iceman]

But i would say that Server 2 would have different track than Server 1. I dont hate sydney but still

[Dowpy]

Take years to drive 10km on Sydney, to much barriers and crap everywhere and ye to small.

[Josh]

I'm in two minds about having Sydney on both servers.

People have always said how great it would be to have a more realistic feel to our servers, especially a city-like track. When we give you a city-like track, people just complain because it's too difficult. I love Sydney, it's actually a challenge.

However I also like giving people the option of driving on a different track as opposed to forcing them to just one.