Rockingham oval rb change
|
2016-12-17, 14:29
(This post was last modified: 2016-12-17 14:47 by Banana4Life.)
Post: #1
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Rockingham oval rb change
I was a bit annoyed how you couldn't carry along the oval because you had to stop for the rb, so I changed it a bit to see if it would be any better:
Old: ![]() New: ![]() You can see now you can either go to the rb, or carry on with the oval. Im not layout maker either no hate, but good idea or not? |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2016-12-17, 14:50
Post: #2
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rockingham oval rb change
Oh and I forgot to add back the exit from rb to the oval as I closed it, silly me
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2016-12-17, 15:06
Post: #3
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rockingham oval rb change
This was pretty much an intentional part of the layout design, in the same way that Kyoto has a roundabout you have to negotiate every lap. I can't see it being removed, as it makes it too easy to barrel round at top speed all day. The roundabout helps to encourage people off the oval and on to the track, otherwise the layout might as well be an oval and only an oval.
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2016-12-17, 15:13
Post: #4
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rockingham oval rb change
Funny how server one and two isn't as full as Server 3 at the moment...
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2016-12-17, 15:54
Post: #5
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rockingham oval rb change | |||||||
2016-12-17, 16:29
Post: #6
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rockingham oval rb change
True, but some people just want to be on the oval? They'll just go through the rb, if they want to go to the inner part they'll know they want to turn off
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2016-12-17, 16:46
Post: #7
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rockingham oval rb change
The original version of the layout had a continuous oval but we wanted it to be broken up like it is on Kyoto to stop people from endlessly circling at full speed.
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2016-12-17, 17:47
Post: #8
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rockingham oval rb change
People would just lap the oval with no braking required, I think it's better to force traffic into the RB.
|
|||||||
2016-12-18, 12:24
Post: #9
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rockingham oval rb change
I see, I just thought it was annoying, that rb has some sharp angles if that makes sense. Guessing it won't get changed but fair enough
![]() |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2016-12-18, 12:45
Post: #10
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rockingham oval rb change
I think that RB should be fixed and made neat. It's tight and you have to make sharp turns sometimes.
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2016-12-18, 19:56
Post: #11
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rockingham oval rb change
I understand that it needs to be there to slow down the traffic and not have people lap 24/7. But it would be nice if the entry was just a little less sharp indeed.
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2016-12-18, 20:17
Post: #12
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rockingham oval rb change
As mentioned above, make it smoth and all will be nice
![]() |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2016-12-18, 20:34
Post: #13
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rockingham oval rb change
the rb is fine how it is I reckon..
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2016-12-18, 20:36
Post: #14
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rockingham oval rb change
Yes I agree with making it smoother
![]() vs ![]() Maybe not open that much up (am no pro remember) but would make it much better with all that left over space being used. Although you could then say people would just speed through it without stopping |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2016-12-18, 20:36
Post: #15
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rockingham oval rb change
Yup, RB needs to be changed
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2016-12-18, 20:49
(This post was last modified: 2016-12-18 20:50 by Borja.)
Post: #16
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rockingham oval rb change
Banana, making it smother dosen't means make it fasther, its just to make the corner little destroyers
![]() |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2016-12-18, 20:51
Post: #17
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rockingham oval rb change
That's something you could speed thru again banana. I think just rounding up the 90 degree edges when you're entering would hlep.
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2016-12-18, 20:58
Post: #18
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rockingham oval rb change
Yea I basically made it a straight from entry to oval exit, maybe a bit less exaggerated
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2016-12-18, 21:16
Post: #19
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rockingham oval rb change
make the roundabout a bit smaller but keep the barriers the same on the out side
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread: | Author | Replies: | Views: | Last Post | |
.!buy prompt change | Kouki | 1 | 489 |
2024-10-30 10:46 Last Post: BP |
|
Corby layout change | Jacob | 27 | 5,495 |
2024-03-25 06:49 Last Post: Chuck |
|
Rockingham layout suggestion | Marty_Deslions | 16 | 3,524 |
2023-10-07 13:31 Last Post: Chuck |
|
Bimmy m46 v10 restriction change | RevLeon | 24 | 6,134 |
2023-05-06 03:26 Last Post: KiiT1337 |
|
Strobe/siren rule change for RES/MED/(COP?) | Marty_Deslions | 2 | 1,119 |
2023-01-09 13:39 Last Post: BP |
|
Rockingham layout changes | Misterviin | 4 | 1,509 |
2023-01-05 19:10 Last Post: BP |
|
![]() |
[Implemented] Add Rockingham (Corby) to the Track Rotation? | Dino | 32 | 7,374 |
2022-12-21 07:56 Last Post: Ghutra |
Layout change suggestion Westhill. | Minivan | 11 | 2,528 |
2022-12-03 16:30 Last Post: Chuck |
|
Change the visibility of the "MOVE FOR POLICE" and "STOP POLICE" for other players | Marty_Deslions | 9 | 2,604 |
2022-05-23 22:57 Last Post: Cam |
|
Mod renting and purchasing management change needed | Vilix | 6 | 2,548 |
2022-03-29 04:39 Last Post: Titan |
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group