- Report - dmcmsn (Report Archived by Gaz)
|
2019-07-31, 15:33
Post: #1
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
- Report - dmcmsn (Report Archived by Gaz)
Users Involved
Your LFS Username: thomasdk95 Their LFS Username(s): dmcmsn Their In-game Nickname(s): Type R Incident Information Date of Incident: 31/7 2019 Time of Incident: 17.15 CEST (roughly) Description of Incident (Include Timestamps): During the chase the user kept on brakechecking in order to cause accidents thus breaking rule 1.2. Do not crash or ram other cars deliberately. Online at the time of the event was four admins; Adrian, Carl, Shino and Chuck neither of whom reacted to the !tc in which the incident was reported as it was going on. The first brakecheck occurs at 2.24 in the replay and the last is at the end of the chase at 15.20. I !tc'ed the rulebreaker at 11.21 in the replay, where Adrian and Shino both were actively driving around on the server, and apparently not caring about a user reporting a rulebreaker. chatlogs Wrote:31/07/2019 4:49:47 PM : 「OK」 tom [COP]: [TC] Type R keeps brakechecking causing crash after crash After the chase I asked in public chat for a response from either of the online TC's which yielded in Shino replying, but shortly after said chase disconnecting. chatlogs Wrote:31/07/2019 4:56:14 PM : 「OK」 tom [COP] : @ TC's I TC'ed it during the chase. Did any of you check it out? Evidence Replay / Screenshot Link(s): https://mega.nz/#!zcQxwaiZ!XW6G2611wAgwT...Y9VIFTJt8U |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2019-07-31, 15:40
(This post was last modified: 2019-07-31 16:00 by Gaz.)
Post: #2
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Status: Investigation Process. Updated by: Gaz.
This report is being reviewed
Please be patient, we will reply shortly. As far as I (and others I asked) am concerned, brakechecking in a chase is a perfectly valid tactic, and pretty much always has been. It's an annoying tactic, sure, but still a valid one. I've never seen anyone have any action taken against them for this, either. The suspect takes the risk of being rammed in the back when they do this, and there's the argument to be made that you can easily counter it by just following from a further distance to avoid it happening. You could argue either way - I say it's just part of the game. I see no reason to take any action. No action has been taken as explained
Thank you for your report, it has now been moved to the archives. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group