Rule against Scam
|
2015-07-21, 14:58
Post: #21
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rule against Scam | |||||||
|
|||||||
2015-07-21, 15:25
Post: #22
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rule against Scam
Real world is cruel place
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2015-07-21, 16:55
(This post was last modified: 2015-07-21 16:56 by Carl.)
Post: #23
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rule against Scam
I mean everything is there for inexperienced users to be able to understand such as the manual and guides. However they are just not aware of them from the first instance. I agree with Sonic here and making rule 1.1 more clear to experienced users what it covers. Although your just silly to scam someone for so much money. An overpay for a car is explainable but to scam that hard..
|
|||||||
2015-07-21, 17:59
(This post was last modified: 2015-07-21 18:02 by Owl.)
Post: #24
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rule against Scam
Scamming in real life is ILLEGAL, if this server + community is suppose to replicate real life driving or real life things in general, then here is the saying I have seen before:
If you wouldn't do it in real life, don't do it in the server! Atbiz: I thought you were more respectful but you are becoming more and more deceitful |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2015-07-21, 18:13
Post: #25
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rule against Scam
I thought it was common sense not to scam people like this. It is a shame we live in such a world.
I wonder if action will be taken against atbiz? |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2015-07-21, 18:14
Post: #26
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rule against Scam
What is the current procecure?
Player A says he sells a car for 20,000€ Player B sends 20,000€ to player A Player A refuses to send the car and leaves the server What will happen? Will player A get banned? Will player B get back his money? |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2015-07-21, 18:27
(This post was last modified: 2015-07-21 18:28 by atbizgames.)
Post: #27
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rule against Scam
(2015-07-21 18:14)Dino Wrote: What is the current procecure? Player A says he sells a car for 17,000€ Player B sends 17,000€ to player A Player A send the car. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2015-07-21, 18:29
(This post was last modified: 2015-07-21 18:30 by KooKoo.)
Post: #28
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rule against Scam
It should be like that Dino. Where Player A gets banned and Player B gets his money back.
(2015-07-21 18:27)atbizgames Wrote:(2015-07-21 18:14)Dino Wrote: What is the current procecure? Ha? You barely can call that a car, 36$ value with 0.1%..... 17k? Clearly you abused the player. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2015-07-21, 18:58
Post: #29
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rule against Scam
Player A should get banned and Player B should get refunded.
I haven't seen that happen though. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2015-07-21, 19:02
Post: #30
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rule against Scam
(2015-07-21 18:27)atbizgames Wrote:(2015-07-21 18:14)Dino Wrote: What is the current procecure? Get another hobby, please. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2015-07-21, 19:02
Post: #31
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rule against Scam
If anything, I think a harsh punishment should given to Atbiz since he still thinks it was correct and absolutely fine to scam the shit out of someone.
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2015-07-21, 19:03
(This post was last modified: 2016-05-06 17:16 by atbizgames.)
Post: #32
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rule against Scam
post deleted by user
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2015-07-21, 19:06
Post: #33
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rule against Scam
(2015-07-21 19:03)atbizgames Wrote:(2015-07-21 18:58)Skoda Wrote: Player A should get banned and Player B should get refunded. There's a difference between asking a TC Member whether you have to provide a VIN when selling, and asking whether you can lie about a price when selling cars. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2015-07-21, 19:10
(This post was last modified: 2016-05-06 17:17 by atbizgames.)
Post: #34
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rule against Scam
post deleted by user
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2015-07-21, 19:10
(This post was last modified: 2015-07-21 19:12 by Dizzle.)
Post: #35
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rule against Scam
(2015-07-21 19:03)atbizgames Wrote:(2015-07-21 18:58)Skoda Wrote: Player A should get banned and Player B should get refunded. Its has been made clear there is no rule specifically for what happened. 1.1 was never discussed between you and I. I answered a specific question you had asked. I became TC not even a week ago. So No, my experience has not been exactly enough to be a proactive thinker into questioning if this could be a scam. However, this has given me the experience to know for the next person. Some people just do not care what they do to others, and the rest have to learn to cope with it. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2015-07-21, 19:10
Post: #36
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rule against Scam
€17,000 > €36. There's a difference, Atbiz.
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2015-07-21, 19:17
Post: #37
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rule against Scam
Atbiz, do you like the image of yourself now? You were once known as a funny person, now a scammer.
And, I must confess, when I sell cars I usually take the price higher by 1k or 1.5k for profit, but, I do PROVIDE the VIN, if not, I atleast provide the condition. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2015-07-21, 19:45
(This post was last modified: 2015-07-21 19:46 by Carl.)
Post: #38
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rule against Scam
Don't flame guys, there is no point. Atbiz is not the only person who has done this, so why are you all calling him out for it?
|
|||||||
2015-07-21, 19:51
Post: #39
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rule against Scam
+1 on Nismo
He is one person who decided to sell a car, and he think that the price for it maybe 17k. Some guy decided to buy it, so its not the problem of seller,just of buyer for dont request more information |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2015-07-21, 19:54
(This post was last modified: 2015-07-21 19:58 by Carl.)
Post: #40
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Rule against Scam
It technically is the sellers fault, Borja hence why there is a trade value already in place. Users should sell the car for the insim trade value or something near to that amount, unless it is a rare/unique VIN in which somebody would overpay for in order to obtain it. All in all, 1.1 rule should be clarified.
|
|||||||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread: | Author | Replies: | Views: | Last Post | |
Additional COP rule: They must use the Lightbar version of their car. | Marty_Deslions | 18 | 3,667 |
2024-03-31 17:25 Last Post: ThePonczeK |
|
Strobe/siren rule change for RES/MED/(COP?) | Marty_Deslions | 2 | 962 |
2023-01-09 13:39 Last Post: BP |
|
New rule suggestion regarding trucks in chases | Misterviin | 10 | 2,319 |
2022-09-09 15:35 Last Post: Batman |
|
Suggestion: Implement a new brake check rule | Sluucke | 3 | 3,670 |
2020-02-11 14:16 Last Post: Sluucke |
|
Poll for new Copping Rule | AOR Nova | 21 | 13,521 |
2019-04-16 02:14 Last Post: AOR Nova |
|
Question about a rule and breaking it | dragon66 | 8 | 5,017 |
2018-02-22 11:45 Last Post: dragon66 |
|
Rule clarification | KaraK | 20 | 15,312 |
2014-08-03 21:57 Last Post: Luke |
|
Suggestion for a law/rule [moving for chases] | Dale | 14 | 11,549 |
2012-12-17 17:00 Last Post: FR4NOx |
|
Out of date rule | Liam :P | 16 | 9,445 |
2012-01-11 21:43 Last Post: Trance |
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group