!laser for slows speeds

[Borja]

Hello cruisers!

As I have had small troubles with two guys the past days... Im here with a suggestion.

The problem its , that driving slower than 30km/h on Highway its dangerous.
But , how can we proove that the suspect were driving under that speed?

Its not usual that anyone drive under that speed , and if does , rarely dont pay the fine, but , what if they start saying that were driving at 50km/h?

The only way to proove it , is coming to forum and doing a report.

What Im suggesting?

Im suggesting that the !laser catch too the drivers who drives under 30km/h.
Also , it can be a bit hard cause the fine only applies on Highway , so , maybe the !laser for slow speed will only work when InSim detect that suspect its on Highway.

Then , instead of saying :
[RDSR] Nismo clocked @ 25kph (+0) - Fine: 0€ • ignored
Says:
[RDSR] Nismo clocked @ 25kph (-5) - Fine: 50€ •

What do you guys think?

[Tingle]

I understand what you're saying, but I think there is room for abuse. For example, say if a car has just crashed at no fault of their own and is starting to pull away, or a car that was stopped on the grass is now beginning to accelerate, it just takes one !laser trigger happy cop to clock them at <30kph and attempt to fine them for it.

I think the system works in its current state. It would be a bit silly for somebody to come on the forum and complain about being fined for it if the replay (which they should have checked for a time stamp at least) shows them doing below 30kph anyway.

To try and further legitimise the fine with a !laser in the context of slow speed would have unintended consequences, as outlined above imo.

[[TC]►BP◄]

What Tingle said. Voting no.

[KooKoo]

They should increase the minimum speed to 60kmh

[[TC] Kyle]

No, there's an overtaking lane for a reason, and you do have an accident it'll be the faster driver's fault as they should be paying attention to the road.

Also what about all the noobies starting out in a UF1 and slow cars? Also you could abuse that rule by clocking people as soon as they enter the AB/Highway...

-1 from me.

[Adorable]

To prevent abuse, a system could be implemented that will only start to take laser measurements that are <30 kph only if the car has been driving less than 30kph for atleast (say) 10 seconds.

Like when changing from a speed limit (120) to a lower one (100). There's a little delay before you can start taking laser measurements. Same could apply for the suggestion at post 1#

€: Anyways, It's not really that important. Witnessing someone doing <30kph for quite some time is enough to fine him.

[KooKoo]

Everything suggested... the only thing to contradict it is by saying "it will be abused".

[[TC]»Pete«]

The amount of time that people are driving at a continual speed of <30kph is negligible. Therefore there's no point adding this special case. It could be open to abuse too if someone is just getting up to speed after a junction or roundabout.

[Borja]

(2016-09-01 09:23)Adorable Wrote:  To prevent abuse, a system could be implemented that will only start to take laser measurements that are 0 kph only if the car has been driving less than 30kph for atleast (say) 10 seconds.

Like when changing from a speed limit (120) to a lower one (100). There's a little delay before you can start taking laser measurements. Same could apply for the suggestion at post 1#

(2016-09-01 09:43)KooKoo Wrote:  Everything suggested... the only thing to contradict it is by saying "it will be abused".

Yes , I agree with both posts.

It was not important suggestion , but something for proof the fine , same as we did for high speeds , but in low speeds.

[guxjim]

(2016-09-01 07:27)KooKoo Wrote:  They should increase the minimum speed to 60kmh

+1