The actual 'teacake' debate.
|
2019-03-15, 22:53
Post: #21
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: The actual 'teacake' debate.
Its clearly image 2...delightful little treats!
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2019-03-16, 01:13
(This post was last modified: 2019-03-16 01:30 by Cam.)
Post: #22
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: The actual 'teacake' debate.
Interestingly, Image 2 has been legally determined to be a 'cake' as opposed to being a 'snack' following a 13-year dispute. A snack was defined as covering 'chocolate covered biscuits'.
This arose out of a legal dispute surrounding VAT. A snack incurs VAT whilst a cake does not. M&S won the dispute in favour of Image 2 being a cake and so they do not need to incur tax on them. Therefore it was not a snack and thus it is not a biscuit. I guess a legally binding decision helps us in asserting Image 2 is a cake, but it does not give us answers in regards to the first part of the name 'tea'. Nor does it refute any claim that Image 1 cannot also be a cake because no such comparison was made here. Perhaps it would be useful (although not determinative) to see whether Image 1 falls within the same VAT bracket as Image 2... It is important to note that this was in the context of VAT and from a commercial point of view, but given that a court has made a ruling on this specific matter probably means a fair bit of meaningful debate had already taken place over the last 13 years. But as mentioned already, it does not prove or disprove anything in regards to Image 1 - The debate continues. Source: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/news...cakes.html Oh, and this source also confirms that somebody has already successfully argued in court that a Jaffa Cake is in fact a cake. @Taz . |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2019-03-16, 01:50
Post: #23
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: The actual 'teacake' debate.
Hence my Jaffa Cake comment in response to BP - it is a cake, called a teacake.
that thing in image one should be referred to as a teabread, as that is effectively what it is. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2019-03-16, 10:34
Post: #24
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: The actual 'teacake' debate.
Anyone that voted for image one needs to be clinically examined.
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2019-03-16, 12:02
Post: #25
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: The actual 'teacake' debate.
like you
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2019-03-16, 13:06
Post: #26
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: The actual 'teacake' debate.
Although Image 2 people seem to be more vocal, they have less votes.
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2019-03-16, 13:59
Post: #27
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: The actual 'teacake' debate.
I would consume image 1 first imo
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2019-03-16, 14:23
(This post was last modified: 2019-03-16 14:23 by Charlie.)
Post: #28
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: The actual 'teacake' debate.
I used to work at a tea rooms about a year or so ago, and we made thousands, literally thousands of toasted teacakes a day.
They look like this: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Image 1 gets my vote! EDIT: They were bloody delicious. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2019-03-16, 14:33
Post: #29
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: The actual 'teacake' debate.
Image 2 is a Tunnock's Teacake. A real Teacake. The only Teacake.
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2019-03-16, 15:16
Post: #30
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: The actual 'teacake' debate.
(2019-03-16 14:23)Charlie Wrote: I used to work at a tea rooms about a year or so ago, and we made thousands, literally thousands of toasted teacakes a day. I worked a summer job at a golf club and that too is what we served |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2019-03-16, 15:45
(This post was last modified: 2019-03-16 15:48 by Sky.)
Post: #31
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: The actual 'teacake' debate.
Why not classify both as Teacakes? as i dont see a reason behind a teacake being one of them.
Spoiler (Click to View) btw looking at Wiki this>> (Click to View) |
|||||||
|
|||||||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group