Mega - [Megaupload successor]
|
2013-01-21, 22:23
(This post was last modified: 2013-01-21 23:18 by Zipppy.)
Post: #1
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Mega - [Megaupload successor]
The successor to MegaUpload is up, has anyone used it yet?
the link to it is https://mega.co.nz/ Here is an article about it on Gizmodo. http://gizmodo.com/5977163/hands-on-with...ht-forever |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2013-01-21, 22:51
Post: #2
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Mega - [Megaupload sucessor]
I think the idea is genius, and I'll probably be using it in the future
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2013-01-22, 01:01
Post: #3
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Mega - [Megaupload successor]
I tried making an account with my Hotmail address, I haven't gotten an activation email yet. It turns out that I'm not the only one with this issue.
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2013-01-22, 04:53
Post: #4
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Mega - [Megaupload successor]
Tried registering but page just kept refreshing so didn't bother.
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2013-01-22, 07:10
Post: #5
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Mega - [Megaupload successor]
I don't see how this is any different from mediafire or dropbox.
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2013-01-22, 07:39
(This post was last modified: 2013-01-22 07:39 by Chuck.)
Post: #6
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Mega - [Megaupload successor]
Well, registration worked but some things are odd. The upload is not working for me, for instance, but the more interesting thing is, they say that all data is encrypted and they do not have the key to decrypt them. I fail to see how this is working since I don't have the key either. If I log-in with a different PC, how does that pc get the key to de/encrypt the files? The only answer would be that the key must be stored on the server, that means also that anyone having access to the server does also have access to the keys.
So that would render their whole concept pointless. The idea is not new btw. Wuala uses client-side encryption, but they require Java to de/crypt files. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2013-01-22, 17:35
Post: #7
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Mega - [Megaupload successor]
Chuck Wrote:The only answer would be that the key must be stored on the server, that means also that anyone having access to the server does also have access to the keys. That's what I was thinking, in order to log into the site they must store a password, the same as they must store the encryption key, unless that key doesn't specifically reference a file, in which case they're pretty much covered. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2013-01-23, 01:52
Post: #8
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Mega - [Megaupload successor]
I'm also curious to actually see the concept in action, I haven't seen it work to be honest.
Still baffled. The site is in an open BETA supposedly. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2013-01-23, 07:20
(This post was last modified: 2013-01-23 07:23 by Chuck.)
Post: #9
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Mega - [Megaupload successor]
Mega Website Wrote:I have forgotten my password. Can I reset it? Well, there you go. Doesn't answer all questions but at least one. Example Download: Elmo's LED Lights: LED Lights.rar (831 KB) https://mega.co.nz/#!zRM1QKoK!Ly0Afx9l9D...vcoZ6VpM20 |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2013-01-23, 15:05
Post: #10
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Mega - [Megaupload successor]
(2013-01-22 07:10)Cola Wrote: I don't see how this is any different from mediafire or dropbox. Encryption. Mediafire isn't, dropbox is as good as unencrypted as the staff have access to the decryption keys. Mega is, in theory, much more secure than nearly all of these kinds of service, however there are some implementation issues. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2013-01-24, 06:36
Post: #11
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Mega - [Megaupload successor]
Good idea but i doubt i be using it, looks bloated!!
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2013-01-24, 07:15
Post: #12
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Mega - [Megaupload successor]
I wouldn't use is for personal things either, but if it helps copying non-personal large files (ie lfs replays), why not? We could also host there things for TC, skin packs etc. if the download is not much of a burden. (ie not plastered with ad banners, pop-ups, captchas, waiting queues and slow download rates)
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2013-01-24, 14:28
(This post was last modified: 2013-01-24 15:49 by Tommer.)
Post: #13
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Mega - [Megaupload successor]
Edit; BTW. If you're interested, there's no coincidence that his name is "Kim Dotcom" http://kim.com/ |
|||||||
|
|||||||
2013-01-24, 22:02
Post: #14
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Mega - [Megaupload successor]
He knows how to put on a show
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2013-01-24, 23:22
Post: #15
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Mega - [Megaupload successor]
he surely does.
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
2013-01-27, 11:38
Post: #16
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
RE: Mega - [Megaupload successor]
and hes right. i would pay money (lets say < 3US to stream a movie in good quality and speed without any subscription.
Even for Movies i wouldnt go to the cinema or buy on DVD / Blu ray otherwise. instead of using the market that is there they try to force the customer in old fashioned consumer habits. Just recently i was looking for the new episodes of a discovery channel TV show. Of course i dont have pay TV and all they offer on the website is a timetable for the broadcast and 3 min trailers for the episodes with a forced 30 sec commercial before each one. if they charged 1 $ instead, i would have propably payaed that. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group