change Server 2 to a other track

[[TC]»Pete«]

Perhaps it might be wise to bring back the tiny tracks: Aston Countryside and Jamaica Deluxe and run those alongside Sydney.

[Zipppy]

(2013-02-17 23:49)Lampshade Wrote:  Aston Countryside

I haven't heard of that one, when was it first announced?

I also remembered, get the USA layout back on.

[ChrisM]

Loved Jamaica Deluxe actually. People just barreled around the track running wide on every corner smashing into oncoming traffic. Then when there was more than 1 chase it just turned into chaos. Quite liked it, even asked Chuck if it could return, but i've forgotten the reason why it couldn't. Something to do with the insim updates we had a while ago maybe, dono.

Aston countryside, never heard of that, can we try it?

[[TC] Stephen]

Probably because open layouts are all the rage these days. I don't think anyone has asked for a non-x track lately, until you just did.

We could throw USA back on, but that would probably work better with insim.

[[TC]►Bez◄]

Sydney is awesome for police chases. Its not all about using speed to get away on that track, but you can quite easily tuck away on a corner and not be seen. Sydney is really enjoyable when its full and also one of the most realistic city driving tracks.

[Savy]

Sydney requires more skill for cops than any other track, therefor it should be the best track to cop on as its the most challenging unless you suck

[Dan]

Although I did +1 on this earlier, when Sydney come on Server One a couple of months ago, seeing as I was relatively knew to the [COP] position, I was just crashing into everything and just really showing incompetence in my driving. Having a wheel now, and overall improved my driving skills (be quiet Orange ), Sydney is actually quite fun.

[[TC]►BP◄]

I'm personally not massively bothered by this, but I think, if anything, Sydney should not be forced on people for an entire week. Montana, Kyoto, Jamaica etc aren't on both servers for a week so I'm personally not sure why Sydney is.

If it's actually because Sydney is a less desirable track for some people for whatever reason, then so be it, if people don't want to play it then I don't think they should be forced to.

[Saphira]

I suffer from quite a bit of FPS probs whilst on Sydney, but its bearable, and i enjoy the track, much harder to get away, have to use more skill, i agree with BP that we should not be forced to use a track, but why cant Sydney be on both servers with 2 diff layouts instead, or like lamp said put another small track on other server. Either way Chuck does a great job and provides us with the tracks we can go on and cruise.

[[TC]►BP◄]

(2013-02-18 17:35)Saphira Wrote:  Either way Chuck does a great job and provides us with the tracks we can go on and cruise.

Yep, I think everyone can agree with that!

Also, another point:

Even though yes, if for example Weston Park and Sydney are on simultaneously, people will most likely go for Weston Park. But I am aware quite a lot of people like Sydney so that's probably not much of a big problem, and because of its already small size, it can get away with not having a huge amount of people (in fact, it could be better due to less mayhem).

[G B]

if everyone loves sydney i´m wondering why sever2 was emtpy all the me

[Johan.]

Because the majority of the people go to the server that is most filled. I mean, if you drive all alone on sydney, its less fun than driving on Kyoto with alot of people.

[Cyanide Christ]

Gotta love smooth 27 fps then cpu freezes and boom 7 fps and when passing areas with parked cars I get around 5-10 fps...

[G B]

well, i dont see the point why we use on 2 servers 1 track. TC has how many maps? 7 or 8? i understand if the host like that track, but i dont understand that if we have 2 servers, that we get forced to use track on both. let the ppl decide by them own what they what drive, and not what the host what drive. I personaly feel only as a dummy for a full server atm. i dont have a vote atm (go i on sydney or go i on sydney?). and that pissed me on tbh.

[Orange™]

(2013-02-18 15:49)danielp1997 Wrote:  Although I did +1 on this earlier, when Sydney come on Server One a couple of months ago, seeing as I was relatively knew to the [COP] position, I was just crashing into everything and just really showing incompetence in my driving. Having a wheel now, and overall improved my driving skills (be quiet Orange ), Sydney is actually quite fun.

What... lol I still not the biggest fan of Sydney. But after being cop for awhile on it. I have found it is the easiest track to gain xp and money. But then again it's easy to get destroyed by many cruisers who think it's still Montana (Go fast go fast) bang crash!! Or am i just a magnet for rammers?

[Ace]

(2013-02-19 11:16)Orange™ Wrote:  What... lol I still not the biggest fan of Sydney. But after being cop for awhile on it. I have found it is the easiest track to gain xp and money. But then again it's easy to get destroyed by many cruisers who think it's still Montana (Go fast go fast) bang crash!! Or am i just a magnet for rammers?

yep its true what orange said its easy to gain xp and money, just be carfull
and slow down early enough. I speced yesterday a few cruisers and it was just a kind of demolition derby. Its fun to cop and cruise for me there and well, its much more realistic than the most other tracks.

[Johan.]

(2013-02-19 11:16)Orange™ Wrote:  

(2013-02-18 15:49)danielp1997 Wrote:  Although [...] fun.

But then again it's easy to get destroyed by many cruisers who think it's still Montana (Go fast go fast) bang crash!! Or am i just a magnet for rammers?

Thats just you Orange. I've driven quite a few km's last night without being hit at all. Just have a strong set on brakes and you'll be fineeee..

[Kyllone]

I always go for the server that has the most players in atm when im connecting. I like driving & chatting with people, not driving alone on a empty server. I can do that in single player if I want. I'm not a SO lover or a hater so I'm ok with it, it feels nice for a chance and really realistic. But for this idea, I think 2 different maps should be on the 2 different servers. I remember couple of times looking that the server 2 had another map and server 1 had SO and still server 1 was more popular. But for me, if the most people are on another track I drive there, if people are on SO I drive there . I'm enjoying more or less of them all

+1 to the idea tho.

[[TC] Brad]

(2013-02-19 05:18)G B Wrote:  well, i dont see the point why we use on 2 servers 1 track. TC has how many maps? 7 or 8? i understand if the host like that track, but i dont understand that if we have 2 servers, that we get forced to use track on both. let the ppl decide by them own what they what drive, and not what the host what drive. I personaly feel only as a dummy for a full server atm. i dont have a vote atm (go i on sydney or go i on sydney?). and that pissed me on tbh.

That's the problem with choice: people come to expect it.

The point of having both on Sydney is so that we get a full server on it. Many people, including me, love the track but unfortunately this usually gets watered down by others who don't give it a chance and go for the standard Montana/Westhill option. This ensures those who like Sydney have a fair opportunity to drive on it without having to do so on their own.