(2016-11-10 19:37)Pipa Wrote: [ -> ] (2016-11-10 18:28)Warped Wrote: [ -> ]It's interesting that you are apparently the spokesman for all the people other than those on Donald's subreddit. How would you know that no one finds it funny? It's your opinion! 
Considering that the majority actually voted for Hillary it's not a far fetch. The other interesting bit is that you actually care about factual statistics or is that only the case when they come from the "biased" side?
If "majority" means 300k votes, then good for you lol. Remember what I told about how some states are more Democratic-leaning? Hillary did
badly as a Democratic candidate, and a large portion of the Democrat supporters thinks that Bernie should've been the presidential candidate--they are angry that the DNC rigged the primaries against him. Here's a chart:
Trump is also the projected winner of the popular vote.
(2016-11-10 19:48)Warped Wrote: [ -> ]Trump is also the projected winner of the popular vote.
What's your source on that?
99% have reported, and Hillary is expected (by most reputable sources) to win the popular vote.
93% seems a bit low compared to most other newscasters saying >99%, but we'll see. NYT predicts a win for Hillary, but it'll be close anyway......
...and largely pointless.
As always, agree with Warped. You're a clever guy, no matter how old are you.
Congratz to Trump. Atleast he's funny.
(2016-11-11 12:12)gyunter Wrote: [ -> ]As always, agree with Warped. You're a clever guy, no matter how old are you.
Congratz to Trump. Atleast he's funny.
Thanks.
http://dailyoccupation.com/2016/09/25/pu...ead-alive/
Putin declared that George Soros is a wanted man, dead or alive! At the moment, this same guy is funding the bigger protests in the U.S. But Putin wants him because "he and his organizations are a threat to Russian National Security." Two birds with one stone.
I still find it odd people on Facebook are betting we are in a war due to Trump...even though Clinton is the one that has issues with Russia. Why aren't people smart enough not to be brainwashed by media?
It is incomprehensible. Though, I like the word that describes them well: sheep. They are so easily deceived it's funny. And now they're taking to the streets with these pre-organized riots and protests. Unbelievable.
In other news, New York Times apologizes for its bias coverage of Trump:
http://nypost.com/2016/11/11/new-york-ti...-on-trump/
Neither Clinton nor Trump should be president.
(2016-11-12 19:09)KaraK Wrote: [ -> ]Neither Clinton nor Trump should be president.
Care to expand on why?
I'm guessing because Hillary has allegations against her (as does Trump by the way, for which he'll be in court for soon), and Trump is unqualified?
Neither are good candidates, it's pretty clear. Saying that, though, the American people have spoken and people now need to give Trump a chance.
The President-elect is qualified to be President. He does not lack any requirements and he was chosen for the job by the voters.
Technically qualified, but one of the least qualified
(2016-11-12 22:15)Brad Wrote: [ -> ]I'm guessing because Hillary has allegations against her (as does Trump by the way, for which he'll be in court for soon), and Trump is unqualified?
Neither are good candidates, it's pretty clear.
Yes, this.
(2016-11-12 22:23)Warped Wrote: [ -> ]The President-elect is qualified to be President. He does not lack any requirements and he was chosen for the job by the voters.
Oh come on, you know what he means.
(2016-11-12 22:15)Brad Wrote: [ -> ]I'm guessing because Hillary has allegations against her (as does Trump by the way, for which he'll be in court for soon), and Trump is unqualified?
You have to be a citizen of the U.S., atleast 35 years old, and must be a resident with-in the U.S. for 14 years. He meets those qualifications.
What is he going to court for?
(2016-11-12 22:31)KaraK Wrote: [ -> ] (2016-11-12 22:15)Brad Wrote: [ -> ]I'm guessing because Hillary has allegations against her (as does Trump by the way, for which he'll be in court for soon), and Trump is unqualified?
Neither are good candidates, it's pretty clear.
Yes, this.
Glad someone could answer for you.
Obama, Clinton approved $278 billion in weapons exports, more than double the total under Bush. Most went to Saudi Arabia:
http://www.defenseone.com/business/2016/...enseOneTCO
Clinton (so called) Foundation and Hillary's presidential campaign were being funded by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, of which both fund ISIS. Disgusting. She knew they funded extreme Islamic groups but still kept taking money from them.
She's ultimately the puppet of
all evil. (Link)
(2016-11-13 05:36)Dizzle Wrote: [ -> ]What is he going to court for?
Fraud allegations regarding 'Trump University'
Saudi Arabia and Qatar doesnt fund ISIS. ISIS was created by the US.
ISIS wasn't created by the US, but, they received their weapons from the US, UK, saudi arabia and others because they sent weapons to the rebels in Syria as these countries were supporting the rebels instead of the government back in 2011 and around that time, then, bam, the plan turned on its head and then a lot of the rebels went to ISIS with their weapons
(this is what i have heard, not sure if it is true)
![[Image: TOGIbcP.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/TOGIbcP.jpg)