(2014-05-16 13:47)Dino Wrote: [ -> ]Isn't it also an assumption from you that I tried to perform a pit manouver there?
Either way, you're saying that u've never kicked someone from pitting into a barrier.
There's a difference between a pit manouver and what you did. Nevermind, back on topic now.
You are correct, that is an assumption. I would however like to know if there's another reason for you to line your car up with my left rear quarter.
(2014-05-16 16:49)Edwin Wrote: [ -> ]Very minor or ideally no damage to either car. Well Dino got heavy damage obviously and flew out of bounds. Pitting someone into a barrier is unfortunate as you cannot control where the person is going but actually guiding someone to a barrier is different.
You're clearly not reading or understanding the rules, Edwin. It says that about
initial contact. If I rammed him at 200km/h, then the initial contact would heavily damage his car. He put himself in a vulnerable situation and I took advantage of it.
(2014-05-16 16:49)Edwin Wrote: [ -> ]Yes obviously if it was the other way round then I'm sure Leon would've taken action against Dino. Just another biased opinion imo.
I think people should stop pulling accusations out of their ass without any form for proof, but I'll entertain you with a couple of screenshots from that very chase.
Pitting me against the edge of a barrier. Wouldn't be pretty, that one.
Wait a minute! In this picture, Dino has performed a PIT that sends me straight into the edge of a barrier. But he said...?
And again. This one would have flipped me if I hadn't caught it.
And here's the grand finale.
And do you know what? I didn't kick a single person during that chase.
Do you still think that I'd
obviously take action against others?
(2014-05-16 17:11)RedJohn Wrote: [ -> ]I don't think it is secondary impact if he was still in contact with his car when he hit the barrier , which why he hit the barrier too but not as heavy as Dino
I don't think you understand what secondary means. Here:
A thesaurus Wrote:Secondary: Coming after, less important than, or resulting from someone or something else that is primary"